When a medical device fails — a pump that over-delivers insulin, a
spinal screw that loosens, a monitor that misses an alarm —
manufacturers, hospitals and patients file a report with the FDA.
Those reports accumulate in MAUDE, a public database of more than
twenty million records. It is one of the few windows the public has
into how devices behave after approval.
In practice that window is nearly opaque. The FDA distributes MAUDE as
a set of raw pipe-delimited text files totalling tens of gigabytes,
split across several tables that must be joined correctly before any
question can be answered. The official web search interface returns
individual reports, not statistics. Researchers who want a rate, a
trend, or a confidence interval must first spend weeks building a
pipeline — and most of the published analyses that result are not
reproducible, because the cohort definition lives in a script nobody
else has.
MaudeDash removes that barrier. Define a cohort in a sidebar; get
harm rates with confidence intervals, subgroup forest plots, trend
tests, and disproportionality signal screening in seconds. Every
analysis ships with the exact filter that produced it and an
auto-generated methods paragraph, so the work is reproducible by
construction.
Clinically meaningful outcomes
Patient harm is classified using the FDA's own seven categories
under 21 CFR 803.3 — death, life-threatening, hospitalization,
disability, congenital anomaly, required intervention, other — not
just the coarse event type most tools stop at.
Statistics that survive review
Wilson score intervals, Cochran-Armitage and Mann-Kendall trend
tests, Fisher's exact, and dual frequentist and Bayesian signal
detection with false-discovery-rate control. Cross-validated against
SciPy on every function.
Search by device, not by code
MAUDE identifies devices by opaque three-letter codes. Type
“pedicle screw” or “infusion pump” and MaudeDash finds them, using the
device names manufacturers actually recorded in the reports.
Reproducible by default
Every cohort has a shareable URL, an exact SQL filter, and a
generated STROBE-style methods paragraph stating the data vintage —
so a reviewer can reproduce your number, not just read it.
Honest about its limits
MAUDE is passive surveillance with no denominator. The tool says so
on every rate it displays, flags unreliable strata, warns on partial
years, and refuses to present proportions as incidence.
Free and open source
MIT licensed, no account, no paywall, no usage limits. The full
build pipeline is published so anyone can rebuild the corpus from the
FDA's own files and verify the numbers independently.